Having the government dictate how people should behave in sexual encounters is a terrible idea.
The State Legislature has passed, in its glorious wisdom a bill that mandates that colleges must observe a “Yes means Yes” standard on college campuses.
Or you can be convicted of rape.
Keep in mind, the wording concerning body language was intentionally left out. This means if a girl doesn’t explicitly say “Yes” you’re a fucking rapist as far as the State of California is concerned.
If a girl sucks your dick without first saying she wants to… you’ve raped her. Because let’s be honest, this standard will only be applied in one direction.
Keep in mind, you’re not just required to ask your partner if she’s consenting as you engage in sex.. you have to fucking REPEATEDLY ASK DURING THE SEX ACT because if you don’t she can say “I tensed up and he didn’t stop therefore he raped me”.
I’m not fucking making that up. That the actual example they use.
So… in closing. If you’re a male and you attend a college in California FUCKING RUN because your college has a vested financial interest in fucking destroying you.
Fuck this shit
Or… You know… Crazy fucking thought… If you have any shred of a doubt that a girl is having second thoughts… You say… “Hey! Are you ok?” And she either says “Yes!” Or she doesn’t. Like it’s that hard for the GUY to talk while he is getting a blow job.
And what if you don’t? What if you don’t pick up on that subtle cue? Does that make you a rapist?
Here’s a scenario… You bring a girl home, she undresses you while you undress her. She pulls a condom out of her purse and puts it on your dick. You fall over onto the bed, she climbs on top of you and starts bouncing with all the Lord gave her.
And mid bounce she remembers “Oh shit, I have a boyfriend, I shouldn’t be doing this” and momentarily tenses up… but keeps fucking.
Well, you’re now a rapist.
That’s what you’re defending. And when I use the word literally it’s not hyperbole.
So here it is… that’s *literally* the scenario you’re defending.
Read this carefully:
Recognizing the dynamic nature of sexual activity, individuals choosing to engage in sexual activity must evaluate consent in an ongoing manner and communicate clearly throughout all stages of sexual activity. Withdrawal of consent can be an expressed “no” or can be based on an outward demonstration that conveys that an individual is hesitant, confused, uncertain or is no longer a mutual participant. Once consent is withdrawn, the sexual activity must cease immediately and all parties must obtain mutually expressed or clearly stated consent before continuing further sexual activity.
The first and the last bits are arguably the most important.
For example… if I fuck a girl and then cuddle up to her afterwards without her expressly stating she wanted it before I did… I sexually assaulted her by this definition.
If I fuck a girl and during the act she gives any indication, however imperceptible that she doesn’t want to, or even if she doesn’t (remember the no longer a mutual participant which is so vaguely worded as to be a legal abomination)… I’m a rapist.
And that last bit is where you get super insane. If a girl is sucking my dick and stops with my cock still in her mouth… I JUST BECAME A FUCKING RAPIST. She just chose for me to be a rapist by leaving my dick in her mouth after deciding she didn’t want to have sex.
And keep in mind… these aren’t scenarios where I have to prove my innocence… these are scenarios that according to the letter of the law I am absolutely fucking guilty.
How can you, in any conscience, defend this?